…already Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., says he will insist that any federal disaster aid be paid for with cuts elsewhere.
Roll Call (via brooklynmutt)
What an asshole.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
…already Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., says he will insist that any federal disaster aid be paid for with cuts elsewhere.
Roll Call (via brooklynmutt)
What an asshole.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
The Working Families Flexibility Act will make it easier for employers to avoid paying for overtime and give workers far less flexibility in their lives.A few people have asked why I’m against this bill. It’s a fair question: what’s so bad about getting to choose whether you get overtime pay or comp time (paid time off) at your job? If you’re a working parent, or you wish you had more time to travel, or whatever, getting comp time instead of overtime pay doesn’t sound too bad.
Here’s the issue: it lets your EMPLOYER choose which one you get. The Fair Labor Standards Act says your boss has to pay you time-and-a-half when you work overtime. If you’re struggling to pay the bills, you probably don’t want more vacation days. You want the money you earned by working ridiculous hours. You want to see your paycheck, not your PTO balance, reflect the time you put in.
Comp time is great. But you can’t trade it in for money - or for your electricity bill. It’d be great if workers could CHOOSE overtime pay or extra paid time off, but letting the employer choose on your behalf is a pretty clear ploy to let employers stop paying you more to work more.
(via corporationsarepeople)
Consider North Carolina. On the national stage, the state is as purple as it gets, with nearly 50-50 results in 2008 and 2012. So what brought on the red tide in the state capitol? A few years ago, Art Pope, a wealthy businessman with a far right political vision, decided to, in effect, buy the the state government. He invested millions of dollars in political campaigns, established thinktanks, and funded fellowships. Now, it’s payday: North Carolina presently has an extremely conservative legislature and an extremely conservative governor, whose agenda includes the privatization of schools, an end to early education, and elimination of the state’s income and corporate tax rates. Oh, and the governor has just appointed Art Pope the state budget director. That’s like the putting the man who wants to burn your house down in charge of fire prevention. Of course, money can talk for liberal causes, too. It just happens that conservatives are getting more targeted political funding, and they have tended to invest it where it gets the biggest political bang: in the statehouses.The rightwing donors who fuel America’s culture wars | Katherine Stewart | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk (via dendroica)
1. Only THREE PERCENT of the very rich are entrepreneurs.
According to both Marketwatch and economist Edward Wolff, over 90 percent of the assets owned by millionaires are held in a combination of low-risk investments (bonds and cash), personal business accounts, the stock market, and real estate. Only 3.6 percent of taxpayers in the top .1% were classified as entrepreneurs based on 2004 tax returns. A 2009 Kauffman Foundation study found that the great majority of entrepreneurs come from middle-class backgrounds, with less than 1 percent of all entrepreneurs coming from very rich or very poor backgrounds.
2. Only FOUR OUT OF 150 countries have more wealth inequality than us.
In a world listing compiled by a reputable research team (which nevertheless prompted double-checking), the U.S. has greater wealth inequality than every measured country in the world except for Namibia, Zimbabwe, Denmark, and Switzerland.
3. An amount equal to ONE-HALF the GDP is held untaxed overseas by rich Americans.
The Tax Justice Network estimated that between $21 and $32 trillion is hidden offshore, untaxed. With Americans making up 40% of the world’s Ultra High Net Worth Individuals, that’s $8 to $12 trillion in U.S. money stashed in far-off hiding places.
Based on a historical stock market return of 6%, up to $750 billion of income is lost to the U.S. every year, resulting in a tax loss of about $260 billion.
4. Corporations stopped paying HALF OF THEIR TAXES after the recession.
After paying an average of 22.5% from 1987 to 2008, corporations have paid an annual rate of 10% since. This represents a sudden $250 billion annual loss in taxes.
U.S. corporations have shown a pattern of tax reluctance for more than 50 years, despite building their businesses with American research and infrastructure. They’ve passed the responsibility on to their workers. For every dollar of workers’ payroll tax paid in the 1950s, corporations paid three dollars. Now it’s 22 cents.
5. Just TEN Americans made a total of FIFTY BILLION DOLLARS in one year.
That’s enough to pay the salaries of over a million nurses or teachers or emergency responders.
That’s enough, according to 2008 estimates by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the UN’s World Food Program, to feed the 870 million people in the world who are lacking sufficient food.
For the free-market advocates who say “they’ve earned it”: Point #1 above makes it clear how the wealthy make their money.
6. Tax deductions for the rich could pay off 100 PERCENT of the deficit.
Another stat that required a double-check. Based on research by the Tax Policy Center, tax deferrals and deductions and other forms of tax expenditures (tax subsidies from special deductions, exemptions, exclusions, credits, capital gains, and loopholes), which largely benefit the rich, are worth about 7.4% of the GDP, or about $1.1 trillion.
Other sources have estimated that about two-thirds of the annual $850 billion in tax expenditures goes to the top quintile of taxpayers.
7. The average single black or Hispanic woman has about $100 IN NET WORTH.
The Insight Center for Community Economic Development reported that median wealth for black and Hispanic women is a little over $100. That’s much less than one percent of the median wealth for single white women ($41,500).
Other studies confirm the racially-charged economic inequality in our country. For every dollar of NON-HOME wealth owned by white families, people of color have only one cent.
8. Elderly and disabled food stamp recipients get $4.30 A DAY FOR FOOD.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) has dropped significantly over the past 15 years, serving only about a quarter of the families in poverty, and paying less than $400 per month for a family of three for housing and other necessities. Ninety percent of the available benefits go to the elderly, the disabled, or working households.
Food stamp recipients get $4.30 a day.
9. Young adults have lost TWO-THIRDS OF THEIR NET WORTH since 1984.
21- to 35-year-olds: Your median net worth has dropped 68% since 1984. It’s now less than $4,000.
That $4,000 has to pay for student loans that average $27,200. Or, if you’re still in school, for $12,700 in credit card debt.
With an unemployment rate for 16- to 24-year-olds of almost 50%, two out of every five recent college graduates are living with their parents. But your favorite company may be hiring. Apple, which makes a profit of $420,000 per employee, can pay you about $12 per hour.
10. The American public paid about FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS to bail out the banks.
That’s about the same amount of money made by America’s richest 10% in one year. But we all paid for the bailout. And because of it, we lost the opportunity for jobs, mortgage relief, and educational funding.
Bonus for the super-rich: A QUADRILLION DOLLARS in securities trading nets ZERO sales tax revenue for the U.S.
The world derivatives market is estimated to be worth over a quadrillion dollars (a thousand trillion). At least $200 trillion of that is in the United States. In 2011 the Chicago Mercantile Exchange reported a trading volume of over $1 quadrillion on 3.4 billion annual contracts.
A quadrillion dollars. A sales tax of ONE-TENTH OF A PENNY on a quadrillion dollars could pay off the deficit. But the total sales tax was ZERO.
It’s not surprising that the very rich would like to fudge the numbers, as they have the nation.
motherfuckers.
(via bohemianarthouse)
A Tennessee lawmaker sponsoring a new bill shutting down animal cruelty investigations suggested animal rights activists were engaging in “tape and rape” tactics, and were “intent on using animals the same way human-traffickers use 17 year old women.” The representative in question, Andy Holt (R-Dresden), owns and operates a facility that raises pigs, cows, and […]
The Republican Party:
A party that dislikes government so much it spends billions of dollars on elections so that it can gain power in order to subsequently undermine and disestablish the very institution it fought so hard to gain control of. It’s a party that is a…
I wonder how many Boston liberals spent the night cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine?
Nate Bell (R), Arkansas State legislator
Which brought this response from an acquaintance who lives in Boston:


(via politicalprof)
I’m pretty sure bringing a gun to a bombing is like bringing a knife to a gunfight, Nate.
The Terrible Thirteen: Meet The 13 Republican Senators That Are Filibustering Any Gun Bill And Will Be Responsible For More Gun Deaths Each Year
Meet the 13 Republican senators who have pledges – in a 8 April letter to Senate majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada– to oppose any legislation pertaining to gun restrictions:
Rand Paul of Kentucky
The junior senator’s penchant for filibusters became famous during his nearly 13-hour speech against the use unmanned drones, and he is one of three senators who sent an initial missive to Reid, warning him of another verbose round. Paul’s independent streak, libertarian leanings and his recent CPAC performance have made him popular among Tea Partiers and young conservatives, but haven’t garnered him much support in the party. Senator John McCain called Paul and cosignatory Ted Cruz “wacko birds” for their refusal to debate certain issues.
Ted Cruz of Texas
A Tea Party favorite who has had to contend with his own “birthers”, the Texas senator has defended his hard-right ideology with an occasionally abrasive fervor. His argumentative style soured a recent debate with senator Dianne Feinstein, in which he spent several minutes attacking her ban on assault weapons and describing the constitution. Feinstein responded: “I’m not a sixth-grader … I am reasonably well educated, and I thank you for the lecture.”
Mike Lee of Utah
The third signatory of the original letter, the junior senator from Utah has made gun rights one of the primary issues of his young congressional career. A former constitutional lawyer, he opposes any changes to regulation in the US, arguing that new rules will unfairly affect law-abiding citizens. He also spoke out against the UN treaty to regulate the global arms trade – a treaty that North Korea and Syria voted against.
Marco Rubio of Florida
Chosen to make the minority rebuttal to President Obama’s state of the union address, Rubio has been seen as a frontrunner to lead a younger, more diverse GOP. He has signed onto the second letter in opposition to any gun control bill, but despite his conservative voting rhetoric, he has not taken to the vitriolic language of Ted Cruz or the defiant attitude of Rand Paul. Party leaders like John McCain and Lindsey Graham have thrown him their support, and his stance on immigration has made him look moderate compared to his peers. Accordingly, he scored a B+ from the NRA.
James Inhofe of Oklahoma
Inhofe has been a conservative staple of the Capitol for two decades, expounding his far-right views on social issues and foreign policy since 1986. He famously continues to deny climate change and proposed an immigration amendment to make English the national language of the US. He is only one of two senators to have received an A+ from both the Gun Owners of America and the NRA, and he has voted to exempt gun manufacturers from lawsuits concerning injury or death due to product defects.
Richard Burr of North Carolina
Since he took office in the House in 1995, Burr stayed a party man for the GOP when he attained his Senate seat a decade later. Burr has supported deregulating everything from tobacco to oil, and he received an A from both the NRA and the Gun Owners of America. His most notable deviation from the party line was with several other senators who voted to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” in 2010.
Mike Enzi of Wyoming
A senior senator from Wyoming, Enzi worked for the Department of Interior and the private Black Hills Corporation before being elected to Congress. His stance on guns follows suit with his conservative social positions; Enzi has voted to ban gay marriage and burning the flag, for instance, and his votes on gun rights earned him an A grade from the NRA.
Jerry Moran of Kansas
Elected to the Senate in the Tea Party rush of 2010, Moran has largely spent his congressional career on matters of deregulation and agriculture. Socially, he has kept to close to the GOP’s most conservative contingent, receiving an A from the NRA. On a few policy issues, however, he has strayed from the party line, as when he voted against No Child Left Behind and Sopa.
Pat Roberts of Kansas
The senior senator from Kansas has largely made a name for himself in national security and foreign policy, after he led the investigation into intelligence failures preceding the war in Iraq. Seeking re-election in 2014, Roberts has turned to social issues and quietly pushed the conservative line. Having voted to allow passengers keep firearms in checked baggage on Amtrack trains, he received an A from the NRA.
Ron Johnson of Wisconsin
Johnson has skewed to the Tea Party values that elected him to his first congressional office in 2010, opposing just about any bill that involves government regulation. He has sponsored a bill that would prevent the DOJ from tracking the purchases of multiple rifles and shotguns and received an AQ from the NRA.
Dan Coats of Indiana
Coats has served twice in the Senate, retiring in 1999 only to return in 2011; his policies have inched to the right in the decade-long interim. Though he voted for background checks and Dianne Feinstein’s original assault weapons ban – votes that dropped his NRA score to a C+ – he has otherwise consistently voted conservatively on social issues.
Mike Crapo of Idaho
Since he took office in the Senate in 1998, Crapo has kept an eye toward energy, earning the scorn of environmentalists for votes in favor of oil drilling and against funding renewable sources. On social issues, he’s voted largely with the far right, and he received an A+ from the NRA for his various votes against regulating guns.
James Risch of Idaho
Idaho’s junior senator took office in 2009 after serving as both governor and lieutenant governor. The NRA has given him an A for his votes against background checks and in support of the right to carry concealed weapons across state lines.
He is aware he just confirmed that he believes in forcing women to bear children against their will, right?
Correct. They’re not even bothering to hide behind the fetal rights agenda anymore.
At least he’s being honest about his motivations for being pro-life.
Pro-children as punishment!
Love,
Rabble
(via taoistsoul)
“In my decades of polling, I recall only one moment when a party had been driven as far from the center as the Republican Party has been today.”
“The outsize influence of hard-line elements in the party base is doing to the GOP what supporters of Gene…
I love it how Krugman deigns to speak for all Republicans.
For the record, this Republican cares about the deficit because of the waste and mismanagement that it represents. And as far as the social insurance system is concerned, most intelligent Republicans since Dwight D. Eisenhower recognize the need for a social safety net. Only the far-right reactionary wingnuts are talking about dismantling that net. The rest of us are exploring ways to make it work better.Careful with your tar and feathers, Mr. Krugman. You’re starting to sound less like an economist and a lot more like a partisan demagogue.
He certainly speaks for 95% of the actual elected ones, judging by their proposals and legislation.
It’s easy to say he’s wrong, but if GOP voters actually disagreed with their congressmen, at some point years ago they would have started voting differently.
If the people the republicans elected into office don’t represent the MAJORITY of their “intentions”, don’t vote for them again - that includes primaries. Republicans have crawled out to the tip of the limb; no one needs to saw it off behind it because it will snap under the weight of its own foolishness.
Karma.
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s budget plan includes cuts in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) of $135 billion — almost 18 percent — over the next ten years (2014-2023),[1] which would necessitate ending assistance for millions of low-income families, cutting benefits for millions of such households, or some combination of the two. Chairman Ryan proposed similarly deep SNAP cuts in his last two budgets.
Rand Paul’s 12+ hour filibuster about drones gets a succinct 43-word response.
The answer is no.