Posts tagged "reproductive rights"
rabbleprochoice:

d1am0ndt1ara:

imhyperdearie:

He is aware he just confirmed that he believes in forcing women to bear children against their will, right?

Correct. They’re not even bothering to hide behind the fetal rights agenda anymore.

At least he’s being honest about his motivations for being pro-life.
Pro-children as punishment!
Love,
Rabble

rabbleprochoice:

d1am0ndt1ara:

imhyperdearie:

He is aware he just confirmed that he believes in forcing women to bear children against their will, right?

Correct. They’re not even bothering to hide behind the fetal rights agenda anymore.

At least he’s being honest about his motivations for being pro-life.

Pro-children as punishment!

Love,

Rabble

(via taoistsoul)

stfusexists:

smdxn:

‘Horrified’ Rep. Cathrynn Brown Now Backtracks On ‘Rape-Baby Is Evidence’ Bill

“I missed this one,” she said, explaining that when she reviewed the draft of her bill, she missed the language problems that led to misinterpretation of her bill.
Albuquerque Rep. Nate Gentry supported Brown’s assertion, adding, “She’s horrified.”
She said the bill is being reworked for clarity.
“Horrified.” She’s a lawyer and a legislator. Didn’t anyone teach her along the way to proofread her work before she publishes it?


What part, exactly, did she “miss”? Because the entire bill was horrifying.

She’s trying to pander to everyone in this legislation, and the only ones truly harmed are the victims of rape.  Why am I not surprised?

stfusexists:

smdxn:

‘Horrified’ Rep. Cathrynn Brown Now Backtracks On ‘Rape-Baby Is Evidence’ Bill

“I missed this one,” she said, explaining that when she reviewed the draft of her bill, she missed the language problems that led to misinterpretation of her bill.

Albuquerque Rep. Nate Gentry supported Brown’s assertion, adding, “She’s horrified.”

She said the bill is being reworked for clarity.

“Horrified.” She’s a lawyer and a legislator. Didn’t anyone teach her along the way to proofread her work before she publishes it?

What part, exactly, did she “miss”? Because the entire bill was horrifying.

She’s trying to pander to everyone in this legislation, and the only ones truly harmed are the victims of rape.  Why am I not surprised?

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

Even when a person is dead, bodily autonomy trumps right to life. After all, they still need permission to harvest organs from a corpse to save other lives. I just think that women should at least have the same right to bodily autonomy as a corpse.

A quote I just read in relation to abortion. Very well put. 

“Body Autonomy” or “Bodily integrity” is self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. You can’t be forced to give blood, bone marrow, or any part of you to another. You can’t even have them taken from you after you die without permission. The fact that you can save a life is irrelevant, nobody can forcefully take something from you.

Yet, there are people out there who believe 50% of the population *must* give up their body for 9 months, even if there’s risk of it killing them. 

This is my new favourite “anti-choice folk are ignorant, sexist, idiots” argument. 

(via justcarl)

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

Here’s an idea: Construct a society where child-rearing isn’t a massive sacrifice. Construct a society where people without children aren’t stigmatized as indulgent or selfish. Construct a society where having a kid is just one decision among many — but one that is supported, and doesn’t (at least for women) tie to career stagnation and financial insecurity. The truth is that when women can control their fertility, they do. Some women want to have a lot of kids, and that’s great and should be supported. But most women want one or two, and that should be supported as well. Some want zero. Right now, the incentives to have children are largely social and biological — “family” still largely hinges on having kids, and most people in America grow up with the basic assumption that you’ll grow up and have a baby or two (I certainly did). There are very few economic incentives beyond the long game (Social Security, pension pay-ins, etc) and, at least for women, almost no individual economic incentives.
Ross Douthat would like you to have more babies (via azspot)

(via silas216)

By most accounts, hundreds of thousands of these untested kits are stacked up around the country. In Illinois, 80 percent of rape kits were going untested as of 2010, Human Rights Watch reported at the time — embarrassing the state to begin a push to test all rape kits. In Michigan, the Wayne County prosecutor, Kym Worthy, said she was shocked to discover more than 11,000 rape kits lying around untested — some dating to the 1980s. Worthy said that her office is now going through the backlog and testing those that are running into statute of limitations deadlines. So far, of 153 kits tested, 21 match evidence in a criminal database and may involve serial rapists. But Worthy, who herself was raped while she was in law school, says the broader problem is indifference to sex crimes. “Sexual assault is the stepchild of the law enforcement system,” she said. “When rape victims come into the criminal justice system, they are often treated poorly. They may be talked out of pursuing the case.” The bottom line, Worthy said, is that “sexual assault is not taken as seriously as other crimes.” That — more than any offensive words — is the real scandal. Kamala Harris, the attorney general of California, eliminated the rape kit backlog in state crime labs after she took office. “If you don’t test it, you’ve got a victim who is absolutely petrified, and you’ve got a rapist who thinks he got away with it,” she said. “There could be nothing worse as a continuing threat to public safety.
Outrageous Policies Toward Rape Victims - NYTimes.com (via jadegordon)

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

The reality is that so-called pro-life movement is not about saving babies. It’s about punishing women for having sex. That’s why they oppose birth control. That’s why they want to ban abortion even though doing so will simply drive women to have dangerous back alley abortions. That’s why they want to penalize women who take public assistance and then dare to have sex, leaving an exemption for those who become pregnant from rape. It’s not about babies. If it were about babies, they would be making access to birth control widespread and free and creating a comprehensive social safety net so that no woman finds herself with a pregnancy she can’t afford. They would be raising money for research on why half of all zygotes fail to implant and working to prevent miscarriages. It’s not about babies. It’s about controlling women. It’s about making sure they have consequences for having unapproved sex.

How I Lost Faith in the “Pro-Life” Movement

This is an amazingly powerful, clear and well-researched article that exposes how the “pro-life” movement is anything but.

(via bagleworm)

(via insanityreignssupreme-deactivat)

think-progress:

Thousands of reproductive rights advocates protest Ireland’s abortion ban, after Savita Halappanavar died when a hospital refused to terminate her pregnancy. 

images via Broadsheet

Not sure how letting a woman die is “prolife”.

(via silas216)

sarahlee310:

timekiller-s:

Lesley Gore’s 1964 hit “You Don’t Own Me,” sadly, is still very timely 48 (!) years later, especially in this election year that has seen unprecedented attacks on women, reproductive autonomy, and gender equity.

YouTube: YouDontOwnMePSA

Also see this from Feministing.

Love it1

In this country, they would support the recriminalization of abortion with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and they would limit access to contraception and other services. But they have also promised to promote policies abroad that would affect millions of women in the world’s poorest countries, where lack of access to contraception, prenatal care and competent help at childbirth often results in serious illness and thousands of deaths yearly. And the wreckage would begin on Day 1 of a Romney administration.

A Potential World of Harm for Women - NYTimes.com

I agree. It’s not just about women’s rights in America..it’s worldwide. I don’t know how anyone can vote against their own best interests… 

(via lostbetweenthepages)

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

NSFW - no joke. Rude & unapologetic.

#INFP - so true. Who knew? #NoH8 #ProChoice #fem2 #ChildAbuse #AnimalAbuse

Contrarian by nature; Democrat by choice. #p2 #p21 #CTL #Obama2012

Together we MUST take back the power wrongfully seized by banks, corporations, and the corrupt politicians they fund. #OWS #99

#Justice4Trayvon is the other tumblr I branched from this one so I could track the developments in the #Trayvon Martin case.

twitter.com/TheRiverWanders

view archive



Contributor at Alan Colmes' Liberaland

TheRiverWanders.com

Home

Ask

Submit