Smith & Wesson, one of the largest gun makers in the country, is headquartered in Springfield, MA. According to the company’s 2012 annual investment report to the SEC (10-k), Smith & Wesson received a large multi-million dollar tax credit from the state that started in 2010…
A top Republican U.S. senator brushed off the anti-tax pledge pushed by activist Grover Norquist and embraced widely for years by GOP lawmakers. “I care more about my country than I do about a 20-year-old pledge,” Sen. Saxby Chambliss told Georgia television station WMAZ, a CNN affiliate, on Wednesday. “If we do it his way, then we’ll continue in debt and I just have a disagreement with him about that.”
Congress faces a year-end deadline to reach agreement on taming the U.S. budget deficit or take other steps to avert the so-called fiscal cliff of mandatory tax increases and spending cuts that experts say would push the country back into recession. At the heart of budget standoff is disagreement over how to raise new revenues to help reduce red ink. President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats call for an increase in tax rates for the wealthiest Americans, while House Republicans, who control that chamber’s majority, favor other approaches for brining in money, such as closing certain tax loopholes and eliminating deductions. Norquist, who heads the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform, has been successful over the years in lobbying a strong majority of congressional Republicans to sign his pledge to not raise taxes.
(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)
The headline from Forbes says it all: If Romney Cuts Taxes For The Rich By 20%, He Will Have To Raise Taxes For The Middle Class By $1 Trillion. This is FORBES people … FORBES. And they’re being generous. I think the math is even simpler than they make it out to be … according to the Tax Policy Center – Romney’s plan will raise taxes on the middle class by $3.7 trillion HERE. But the bottom line is this … EVERYONE … conservatives and liberals alike recognize that Mitt Romney is lying about his tax plan. And yet – Americans across the country are going to vote for him simply because he has an R next to his name and he’s not the black guy.
They write HERE:
First the $5 trillion in tax cuts which reduces the income tax on the wealthy by 20%($2.5 trillion), eliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax($700 billion), repeals the high-income payroll tax($300 billion) and hands out a juicy $1 trillion tax cut for corporations. They’re like people you know. Nice clean math. Nice big figures with a lot of zeroes.
Then, comes the problem, the headache, or maybe its the head fake. No identification of a single loophole that will be closed. No concrete exposition about raising the capital gains tax on rich people. Our friends at the Democratic Party headquarters have estimated the savings for “ending all tax benefits for the wealthy” at $1.7 trillion; eliminating ALL corporate tax benefits to offset the corporate tax cut- $1.1 trillion and then another $1 trillion of middle class tax benefits to pay for the middle class cut=- another $1 trillion.
Imagine the chaos, the bitterness, the social unrest that would occur. But, then realize these measures only get back $4 trillion. There’s another $1 trillion to go.
Let’s just look at all the people and institutions who have called Mitt Romney’s plan a complete fantasy:
- Paul Krugman says Romney “is just faking” his plans HERE; in other words – Romney is just making sh-t up.
- The Salt Lake Tribune endorsed Obama over Romney saying “Romney is willing to say anything to get elected” HERE.
- A large margin of economists prefer Obama over Romney for just about everything HERE.
- The Congressional referee – the Joint Committee on Taxation says Romney’s plan is impossible HERE.
- The former McCain economic adviser and current chief economist for Moody’s says the arithmetic “doesn’t work” HERE.
- Politifact says Romney’s claim that 5 independent studies corroborate his math is “mostly false” HERE.
- A Fox “journalist” actually says “How can you not tell the people these facts” HERE.
- An independent study by the Brookings institution says Romney’s tax plan isn’t mathematically possible HERE.
- Factcheck.org says his math is impossible in Romney’s Impossible Tax Promise.
- I’ve given a very simple explanation that Romney’s plan will in fact cut taxes for the wealthiest Americans HERE.
- The Tax Policy Center says Romney’s plan is a $5 trillion tax cut which would give anyone making more than $1 million a year at least an $87k tax cut HERE.
- Bill Clinton says Romney’s tax math is impossible HERE.
- Fox’s Chris Wallace calls out the Romney campaign for their math HERE.
- The Council on Foreign Relations says “there is a $1 trillion hold in Romney’s budget math” HERE.
Who else do you need to verify this plan to understand the only possible scenario is an increase in taxes for the middle class; the math is simply impossible.
And there you have it! Straight from the asses mouth. Romney means more taxes for those who can least afford it.
(via end-the-republican-mafia)
Read six more questions for Mitt at ThinkProgress
1. After the election, when the subject of your tax returns is outside of the public glare, will you file an amended tax return to claim your full deduction of charitable contributions? Was the tax rate you reported…
- Romney’s tax plan would personally save Sheldon Adelson a total $2.3 billion in taxes.
- It saves Adelson approximately $1.5 million in tax cuts on his CEO salary.
- In one year, Adelson could more than earn back his $100 million in political…
Willard Romney plans to bankrupt America.
Conservatives, Melissa Harris-Perry has had it with your bullshit.
A discussion on the racialized political rhetoric surrounding welfare took a turn close to home for Melissa Harris-Perry on her show Saturday morning, as she offered author and BusinessWeek columnist Monica Mehta a glimpse at the kind of places in which people who need of social-assistance programs often live.
Harris-Perry’s animated remarks were a response to Mehta’s opinion that President Barack Obama’s much-twisted “You didn’t build that” speech missed an emphasis on risk-taking, something she suggested enabled class mobility in America.
“What is riskier than living poor in America? Seriously!,” she said, slamming her hand on her desk. “What in the world is riskier than being a poor person in America? I live in a neighborhood where people are shot on my street corner. I live in a neighborhood where people have to figure out how to get their kid into school because maybe it will be a good school and maybe it won’t. I am sick of the idea that being wealthy is risky. No. There is a huge safety net that whenever you fail will catch you and catch you and catch you. Being poor is what is risky. We have to create a safety net for poor people. And when we won’t, because they happen to look different from us, it is the pervasive ugliness”
Harris-Perry later apologized for getting hot under the collar — but not, thankfully, for her argument. This is 100%, inarguably, absolutely true — which is why the conservatives on the panel barely even tried to dispute it. Instead, they went straight to clarification mode.
Donald Trump has filed for bankruptcy over and over, yet he remains ungodly rich. The fact of the matter is that it’s very, very difficult to stop being rich in America. The idea that a business venture can fall through and leave you penniless seems as antiquated as handlebar mustaches and bicycles with giant front wheels.
But consider the logic; even if it were absolutely true that the rich took real risks, what would they be in risk of? Death? No, poverty. By conservative arguments, being poor is such an unimaginably horrible circumstance that the wealthy have to be protected from that possibility at every turn — even if their own decisions (i.e., “risk-taking”) are what brings them there. But those who are already poor — well, that’s their own damned fault for making bad decisions. Sink or swim buddy; this is the Land of Opportunity, not the Free Ride Terminal.
To be a conservative means to be unfettered by the bonds of logic and to be free from the chore of thinking things all the freakin’ way through.
absolutely brilliant. The real good stuff is at the 8 minute mark.
The impervious chirping of Mehta was insulting, irritating, and condescending.
(via sarahlee310)
“Bottom line: Mitt Romney has not paid all the taxes required under law.”
reprinted in its entirey:
Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) August 10, 2012
According to the Huffington Post in article posted on July 31, 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/harry-reid-romney-taxes_n_1724027lhtml, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has what he says is an informed explanation for why Mitt Romney refuses to release additional tax returns. According a Bain investor, Reid charged, Romney didn’t pay any taxes for 10 years. “Harry, he didn’t pay any taxes for 10 years,” Reid recounted the person as saying.
The general rule is that the IRS and others cannot disclose private taxpayer information, including 10 years of tax returns of Governor Romney. But there are statutory exceptions to that disclosure restriction.
Section 6103(f) of the Internal Revenue Code expressly permits inspection of returns by the House Ways and Means Committee, Senate Finance Committee, and Joint Committee on Taxation, and also permits inspection by any select Committee of Senate or House, or joint committee authorized by legislative resolution to investigate returns. These committees may submit relevant, useful information to Senate, House or both.
Section 6103(f) Disclosure to committees of Congress.
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation.
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
(2) Chief of Staff of Joint Committee on Taxation.
Upon written request by the Chief of Staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish him with any return or return information specified in such request. Such Chief of Staff may submit such return or return information to any committee described in paragraph (1), except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
(3) Other committees.
Pursuant to an action by, and upon written request by the chairman of, a committee of the Senate or the House of Representatives (other than a committee specified in paragraph (1)) specially authorized to inspect any return or return information by a resolution of the Senate or the House of Representatives or, in the case of a joint committee (other than the joint committee specified in paragraph (1)) by concurrent resolution, the Secretary shall furnish such committee, or a duly authorized and designated subcommittee thereof, sitting in closed executive session, with any return or return information which such resolution authorizes the committee or subcommittee to inspect. Any resolution described in this paragraph shall specify the purpose for which the return or return information is to be furnished and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained from any other source.
The Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee is expressly authorized to request any tax return. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue is required to comply with a request for specific tax returns from any of those designated with that authority under the section 6103(f) statute. The ease with which the Romney returns can be requested from the IRS from an authorized source under section 6103(f) makes it the likely that those tax returns are under review by that authorized source, in the opinion of Tax Attorney Alvin S. Brown. Mr. Brown speculates that the allegations that Governor Romney did not pay taxes for a 10 year period may be valid in part based on the ease of access for those returns by a host of members of Congress, including Senator Reid. Mr. Brown notes also that the attribution for that information from a Bain informant may not be accurate. Mr. Brown suggests that public knowledge that the tax returns of Governor Romney were requested by a person authorized to receive those tax returns would likely be perceived by the public and the media as an unfair breach of trust.
Mr. Brown notes also that the IRS may make disclosures of tax return data to the President of the United States under section 6103(g) of the IRS Code.
Mr. Brown does not express any opinion on whether there has been a disclosure of tax return data of Governor Romney, but he notes that it is “unlawful” to make a disclosure of any private information in a tax return under section 7213 of the IRS Code. Mr. Brown believes that a comment that Governor Romney did pay taxes for some years, if taken from a tax return would likely be viewed as a section 7213 issue.
In the circumstance Mr. Brown speculates that the Bain “source” may have been mentioned as a distraction to avoid disclosing possession of those tax returns in a Capitol Hill office safe. Mr. Brown acknowledges that there is no information that anyone, authorized to obtain Mr. Romney’s tax returns under section 6103(f) or 6103(g), has actually made that request. On the other hand Mr. Brown suggests that the information in the Huffington Post article, if true, could have come from the tax returns of Governor Romney. Section 7213 makes it a felony to make an unlawful disclosure of tax return information.
Alvin S. Brown, Esq.
Tax Attorney
Alvin Brown & Associates
575 Madison Ave., 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022-8511
http://www.irstaxattorney.com
(212) 588-1113
ab(at)irstaxattorney(dot)com
Great job, Rachel. Every reporter should be asking Romney why he expects them to trust him now, after he lied about his tax returns in 2002.
(via kp777)
Yesterday, in response to months of requests for him to release many more years of tax returns, Mitt Romney dismissed this topic as “small-minded” and said he had never paid less than a 13% tax rate.
If this information was designed to make those who want to see Romney’s tax returns feel like fools for asking, it didn’t.
Rather, it caused lots of jaws to drop.
Why?
Well, first because Romney confirmed what most people have long assumed, which is that he pays an extraordinarily low tax rate for someone who makes so much money.
Second, because the tax rate that Romney seemed proud to have paid was a lower tax rate than half of Americans pay.
[…]Unlike those who argue that Romney’s money is Romney’s money and that every dime that he is forced to pay in taxes is a dime that is effectively stolen or “confiscated” from him, Simon recognizes that his financial success is in part due to the economic environment in which he lives and works:
Mitt Romney paid taxes at a rate of at least 13 percent. And he’s proud to say so.
Can we stand back and pause a short minute to take in the spectacle of a man who wants to be President of The United States, who wants us to seriously regard him as a paragon of the American civic ideal, declaiming proudly and in public that he has paid his taxes at a third of the rate normally associated with gentlemen of his economic benefit?…
Thirteen percent. The last time I paid taxes at that rate, I believe I might still have been in college. If not, it was my first couple years as a newspaper reporter. Since then, the paychecks have been just fine, thanks, and I don’t see any reason not to pay at the rate appropriate to my earnings, given that I’m writing the check to the same government that provided the economic environment that allowed for such incomes.
President Obama’s team is offering Mitt Romney a deal on taxes: Publicly release five years of returns, and the Obama campaign will drop its insistence for additional tax information.
“I am writing to ask again that the Governor release multiple years of tax returns,” wrote Jim Messina, Obama’s campaign manager, “but also to make an offer that should address his concerns about the additional disclosures. Governor Romney apparently fears that the more he offers, the more our campaign will demand that he provide. So I am prepared to provide assurances on just that point: if the Governor will release five years of returns, I commit in turn that we will not criticize him for not releasing more — neither in ads nor in other public communications or commentary for the rest of the campaign.”
The email, addressed this morning to Messina’s counterpart Matt Rhodes, Romney’s campaign manager, stresses that the request is “surely not unreasonable” given Romney’s father made 12 years of tax returns to the public during his presidential run.
Read more from TPM’s Igor Bobic at TalkingPointsMemo.com…
I’m soooo surprised they turned down the offer. (Rolling my eyes)
Whatever’s in those returns kept him off the ticket in 2008.